![]() The researchers think their approach to lineups has the potential to reduce wrongful convictions, resulting in more justice for all. The study is in the journal Nature Communications. “People are far better at making relative judgments than they are at making absolute judgements.” “So on each pair, the witness will vote for one or the other of the faces: Which one looks more similar to the person you remember from the crime scene? We then tabulate that vote. And the face that has the largest number of votes is the winner.”Ĭompared to traditional lineup techniques, the two-faces-at-a-time method led to a less biased and more accurate identification of the fictional perpetrator. The next day, these study subject “witnesses” viewed a six-person lineup that showed just two faces at a time. In an experiment, they had volunteers watch a clip of a grisly crime scene from an obscure Hollywood movie. This issue can result in errors.Īlbright’s team thinks there’s a better way-by tapping into the strength of the witness’s memory. During the films opening sequence, we witness the first occurrence of a character. “The eyewitness is simply asked to identify any person that they remember from the crime scene.”īut only having them pick their top choice doesn’t account for how well the witness remembers that face. The movies Other World displays a distinctly uncanny and dream-like. Lineups typically show witnesses photos of six faces-five of innocent people and one of the suspect. “If somebody tells us that they saw something, we figure, well, it must be true. Why do witnesses sometimes get it so wrong? Albright explains that our memory for visual events is notoriously flawed. “Somebody picked them out of a lineup, and that information was taken seriously by the police. Most of these innocent people were sent to prison because witnesses misidentified them. “There are now hundreds of cases in which individuals have been exonerated based on this post-conviction DNA analysis.” ![]() “And it turns out that the DNA that was found at the crime scene was not the DNA of Uriah Courtney.”Īfter eight years behind bars, Courtney was set free. He says years later, the California Innocence Project looked into the case. Salk Institute for Biological Studies neuroscientist Tom Albright. Actually, the website deserves more than that but the main domain name was blocked and they had to operate under a new one. It drives more than 100k visitors per month. And he was convicted, entirely based on those two eyewitness accounts.” Another mention worth torrent provider -Limetorrent has an easy to navigate interface with plenty of categories. They saw a lineup in the police station, and they both identified the same person. Watch 250+ channels of free TV and 1000's of on-demand movies and TV shows. In 2006 a 26-year-old California man named Uriah Courtney was sentenced to life in prison for kidnapping and rape, despite having an alibi for the time the crimes were committed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |